[This is written in response to the second comment at this report at brietbart.com]

I have no respect for that comment, Cindy.

First, all of the questions center on religion or aspects of personal history which are implicitly assumed to be bad (else why ask about them - what can they have, minus such assumptions, logically, to do with a politician’s values, platforms, etc? - never mind that even “logically” they don’t?) Here’s a comparison: back in Kennedy’s day if anyone asked “Did you know he’s a Catholic?” - to answer either “Yes” or “No” would admit, unchallenged, the unstated but assumed position of “No Catholic could be a good president” - itself carrying yet another nasty layer of an assumed “Every Catholic tarnishes politics.” (or is or does X or Y bad thing) Even in Kennedy’s day the United States hadn’t much unshackled itself from bigotry against Catholics and/or Irish people - during the surge of Irish immigrants late in the 19th and early 20th century, it was common for hiring businesses to post signs that read IRISH NEED NOT APPLY; that social segregation broke down later but strains of prejudice still ran strong - and still do, against many religions and many ethnicities. To buy into such unfounded assumptions, unchallenged, that any such matters probed so nefariously in such cartoonish, distorted, vastly oversimplified and unrealistic caricatures - to suppose these hold any validity against the good of people or their abilities is to follow in the path of hasty, bigoted foolishness. Learn about the people you may vote for. Don’t take oversimplified sound bytes and questions as valid inquisitions into truth. For heaven’s sake, have we not seen enough in this nation of the potential for misleading information and bigotry to tarnish and corrupt?

Some proper responses to either the question “Did you know Kennedy is a Catholic?” or “Did you know Romney is a Mormon?” are these: “Did you know our constitution forbids any test of religion for Presidential Candidates?” - or “It is very sad that after so many turmoils our nation has suffered at the hands of bigotry that it continues to run so strong.”

Religion is nothing to a candidate’s eligibility. Where religion informs values, that may be the only area of concern. Mormonism’s values are by and large square with the traditional and mainstream values of historical and conservative America. Period. End of that discussion.

And (at last) second, the question “why is Mitt whining” is simply nasty. First, it’s quite inaccurate to assert he whines. Second, sadness or disappointment is an appropriate response to bigotry; and the mature response is, rather, to ask How has our nation not learned, after so many wars that hinged on questions of bigotry (The Civil War won in defense of Blacks, and the Second World War in defense of Jews and many others - both wars also in defense of our own citizens), that bigotry is one of the primary destroyers of civilization - or How does our nation still tolerate bigotry - even so glibly unsubtle, rampant, and shameless? Down with bigotry! Judge a man by his values and the content of his character, not by his religion, his race, or any other ethnic concern. Bigotry is a favorite tool of the Devil. Wake up to it! Snap out of it, America!