The Dark Crystal
Philosophy Comments OffMy sister sent this link about a Dark Crystal sequel:
http://www.muppetcentral.com/news/2005/051305.shtml
My first response: Uuuugh. My second response: I fear this might be bland opportunism. My third response: I resent that I am going to see this movie.
The original film is one I have a love/hate relationship with. The art, music, and puppets are wondrous. I even like the story, except for the ending. Light and Dark are expressed as one yet dual in two different entities, fantastic races linked to each other - the Mystics and the Skekis. The plot of the thing is that they were formerly one, and split thousands of years ago because of hubris (I see this as an analogy of the Christian concept of the fall). The film’s resolution is the dual creatures reuniting into.. I don’t know, a state of absolution from either good or evil, I suppose, a merge back to “perfect”, and perfectly boring, beings.
I’m only just aware that this plot employes philosophy different from my own, which of course I nither understand nor like. It seems, though I say it without authoritative observation, a mixture of elements from Taoism and Hinduism.
I would have the film differently: I’d have it resolve by subjecting and destroying evil; however this would be expressed in the film’s analogy, and even if it meant substantially altering some of the ground rules and back story.
Besides being one of the films I feel a compulsion (if more weakly) to re-write, I don’t think the original left any room for a sequel: perfection in whatever express form by the film’s philosophy was attained. A sequel would be striving for perfection after perfection. I think a prequel could be very interesting, potentially. Also, while it’s scripted by the same fellow who scripted the original, the concept and story was Hensen’s, and I haven’t heard that he left any notes lying around for sequels or prequels (though I would welcome this).
